×

AI Omnibus and the Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230

17.07.2026

What Changes for CE Marking of AI-Enabled Machinery?

The AI Omnibus confirms that AI-enabled machinery will primarily be regulated under the Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 instead of the full high-risk regime of the AI Act. Manufacturers must still obtain CE marking, perform conformity assessment, prepare technical documentation and ensure machinery safety. AI-specific safety requirements will gradually be incorporated into the Machinery Regulation by August 2028.

Quick Answers

Need a quick answer? Here are the most common questions manufacturers ask about the AI Omnibus and the Machinery Regulation.

Is CE marking still required?
Yes. Manufacturers must still complete the conformity assessment, prepare technical documentation and affix the CE marking before placing machinery on the EU market.

Does the AI Omnibus replace the Machinery Regulation?
No. The Machinery Regulation remains the main legislation for machinery. The proposal simply removes unnecessary overlap with the AI Act.

Does the AI Act still apply?
Yes. The AI Act continues to apply where relevant, but AI-enabled machinery will primarily be assessed under the Machinery Regulation.

When does the Machinery Regulation become mandatory?
20 January 2027. From this date, Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 replaces the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC.

Are AI safety requirements disappearing?
No. Safety requirements remain in force. Future delegated acts will integrate additional AI-related essential health and safety requirements into the Machinery Regulation.

Should manufacturers wait until 2027?
No. Risk assessments, cybersecurity measures and AI-related documentation should already be part of your product development process.

Regulatory Timeline

Understanding the key milestones helps manufacturers prepare for the transition from the Machinery Directive to the Machinery Regulation and future AI-related requirements.

June 2023
Machinery Regulation Published
Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 was published in the Official Journal of the European Union, starting the transition period from the Machinery Directive.

2026
Preparation Phase
Manufacturers should review technical documentation, update risk assessments, evaluate AI functions and prepare internal compliance procedures before the Regulation becomes applicable.

20 January 2027
Machinery Regulation Becomes Applicable
Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 officially replaces Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC. New machinery placed on the EU market must comply with the Machinery Regulation.

2027–2028
AI-Specific Rules
The European Commission is expected to introduce delegated acts that integrate AI-specific essential health and safety requirements into the Machinery Regulation.

What Does This Mean for Manufacturers?

Although the Digital Omnibus simplifies the regulatory framework, manufacturers are still responsible for demonstrating that their machinery is safe, compliant and ready for the European market.

✔️
Continue following the CE marking process
The conformity assessment procedure, technical documentation, Declaration of Conformity and CE marking requirements remain unchanged.

✔️
Review products that include AI
Machinery using AI for monitoring, decision-making or safety functions should already be evaluated during risk assessment and product design.

✔️
Update technical documentation
Technical files should clearly explain software architecture, AI functionality, cybersecurity measures and implemented safety controls where applicable.

✔️
Start preparing before 2027
Waiting until the Machinery Regulation becomes applicable increases compliance risks. Early preparation reduces delays during market access.

Machinery Regulation Compliance Checklist

Use this checklist to evaluate whether your machinery is on track for compliance with the Machinery Regulation and future AI-related requirements.

☐
Identify applicable EU legislation
Confirm whether your product falls under the Machinery Regulation and identify any additional legislation such as EMC, LVD, RED or the AI Act.

☐
Review AI functionality
Determine whether AI performs safety-related functions, autonomous decision-making or influences the safe operation of the machinery.

☐
Update the risk assessment
Include software behaviour, AI algorithms, cybersecurity risks, data integrity and human interaction within the overall risk assessment.

☐
Verify Essential Health & Safety Requirements
Confirm that every applicable Essential Health and Safety Requirement (EHSR) has been addressed and documented.

☐
Update the Technical Documentation
Ensure that software architecture, safety concepts, validation activities and cybersecurity measures are clearly documented.

☐
Complete the conformity assessment
Apply the appropriate conformity assessment procedure and involve a Notified Body where required.

☐
Prepare the EU Declaration of Conformity
Verify that the Declaration of Conformity reflects all applicable legislation, standards and responsible parties.

☐
Affix the CE marking
Once compliance has been demonstrated, place the CE marking on the machinery before making it available on the EU market.

Need Expert Support?

Not sure whether your machinery meets the new requirements?

Every product is different. Whether your machinery incorporates AI, advanced software or conventional control systems, our compliance specialists can help you identify the applicable legislation, evaluate conformity requirements and prepare the documentation needed for CE marking.

✓ Machinery Regulation
✓ AI Compliance
✓ CE Marking
✓ Technical Documentation
✓ Risk Assessment

Does Your Machinery Use AI?

Use this decision guide to understand which AI-related risks and compliance requirements may need to be addressed during the machinery conformity assessment.

Step 1

Does the machinery include software or an AI-based system?

No
Continue with the standard Machinery Regulation conformity assessment. Other software or cybersecurity requirements may still apply where digital components are used.

Yes
Continue to Step 2 and determine whether the system influences the safety, behaviour or operation of the machinery.

↓
Step 2

Does the AI system affect a safety-related function?

No
Document the function and confirm that failures, incorrect outputs or foreseeable misuse cannot create or increase a safety risk.

Yes
Treat the AI function as part of the safety system. Include it in the risk assessment, validation process and technical documentation.

↓
Step 3

Can the system adapt or change its behaviour after deployment?

No
Validate the fixed software version and maintain configuration control for updates, patches and modifications.

Yes
Define clear limits for adaptive behaviour and demonstrate that the machinery remains safe throughout its intended lifecycle.

↓
Step 4

Is the machinery connected to a network or external system?

No
Cybersecurity risks may be more limited, but access controls, software integrity and update procedures should still be reviewed.

Yes
Assess unauthorized access, malicious manipulation, remote updates, data integrity and loss of communication as potential safety risks.

Your conclusion
If AI, adaptive software or network connectivity can influence the safe operation of the machinery, these functions should be addressed as part of the machinery risk assessment, technical documentation, verification and conformity assessment process.

Common Compliance Mistakes to Avoid

The AI Omnibus may reduce regulatory overlap, but it does not remove the need for a complete machinery conformity assessment. These are some of the most common mistakes manufacturers should avoid.

×

Assuming AI rules no longer apply

Simplification does not mean exemption. AI-related safety risks must still be identified, assessed and controlled under the applicable regulatory framework.

×

Treating software as separate from machinery safety

Software, algorithms and digital control systems must be included in the risk assessment when they influence the behaviour or safe operation of the machinery.

×

Ignoring cybersecurity-related safety risks

Unauthorized access, manipulated data, malicious software and compromised updates can affect machinery safety and should be addressed in the risk assessment.

×

Relying on a software supplier’s statement

Component or software declarations do not replace the manufacturer’s responsibility to assess the safety and compliance of the complete machinery.

×

Failing to control software updates

Updates, patches and changes to AI models may affect validated safety functions. Manufacturers need clear procedures for review, approval, testing and traceability.

×

Waiting until January 2027

Products with long development cycles should be reviewed before the Machinery Regulation becomes applicable. Late preparation can delay testing, documentation and market access.

Manufacturer responsibility remains central

Even when external software developers, system integrators or component suppliers are involved, the manufacturer of the complete machinery remains responsible for demonstrating conformity before the product is placed on the EU market.

Frequently Asked Questions

Find answers to common questions about the Digital Omnibus, AI-enabled machinery and compliance with the Machinery Regulation.

Does the Digital Omnibus remove CE marking requirements for AI-enabled machinery?

No. Machinery placed on the EU market must still undergo the applicable conformity assessment. Manufacturers remain responsible for preparing the technical documentation, issuing the EU Declaration of Conformity and affixing the CE marking.

Does the AI Act still apply to machinery?

It may. The applicable requirements depend on the function and classification of the AI system. Manufacturers should assess the complete product under the Machinery Regulation and separately determine whether obligations under the AI Act or other EU legislation also apply.

When does the Machinery Regulation become mandatory?

Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 becomes fully applicable on 20 January 2027. From that date, it replaces the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC for machinery placed on the EU market.

Must AI functionality be included in the machinery risk assessment?

Yes, where AI functionality can influence the behaviour, operation or safety of the machinery. The assessment should consider foreseeable failures, incorrect outputs, adaptive behaviour, human interaction and possible effects on safety-related functions.

How should manufacturers address cybersecurity risks?

Cybersecurity should be assessed where unauthorized access, manipulated data, compromised software or loss of communication could affect machinery safety. Relevant controls may include access management, secure updates, software integrity checks, vulnerability handling and protection against malicious interference.

What information about AI should be included in the technical documentation?

The documentation should explain the intended function, system architecture, safety-related behaviour, operating limits, validation methods, risk controls and update procedures. The required level of detail depends on how the AI system affects the machinery.

Can a software supplier take responsibility for machinery compliance?

A supplier can provide supporting documentation, test results and technical information, but the manufacturer of the complete machinery remains responsible for demonstrating conformity of the final product.

Do software updates require a new conformity assessment?

Not every update automatically requires a complete new conformity assessment. However, manufacturers should evaluate whether an update changes the intended use, safety functions, risk profile or validated behaviour of the machinery. Significant changes may require additional assessment and updated documentation.

Will a Notified Body be required for AI-enabled machinery?

This depends on the machinery category, the applicable conformity assessment procedure and the role of the AI system. AI functionality alone does not automatically mean that a Notified Body must be involved.

When should manufacturers start preparing?

Preparation should begin during product development rather than shortly before the January 2027 deadline. Early review allows time to update risk assessments, technical documentation, testing procedures, supplier agreements and internal compliance processes.

Official EU Sources

This article is based on official European legislation and guidance. We recommend consulting the original legal texts alongside professional compliance advice.

Official European Union legislation database containing Regulations, Directives and legal acts.
Official legal text replacing the Machinery Directive from 20 January 2027.
Information about the European Artificial Intelligence Act and related implementation guidance.

    Questions? Contact us Today





    Do you have more questions?

    Our experts help you further